A Detailed Comparison
Edge Delta vs
Cribl (2025)
Compare Edge Delta and Cribl's Telemetry Pipelines across eight categories
VS



Use Cases
Edge Delta vs Cribl — Use Cases
|
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Observability |
|
|
Security |
|
|
Both Edge Delta’s and Cribl’s Telemetry Pipeline solutions provide support for security and observability use cases.
Data Processing
Edge Delta vs Cribl — Data Processing
|
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Primary Processing Approach |
Edge-based, intelligent pre-ingestion processing; enables real-time insights at scale
|
Stream-based, post-ingestion processing; latency gap between processing and insight extraction
|
Throughput Capability |
Optimized for large scale, petabyte-per-day workloads
|
Capped at 200GB per day total throughput per vCPU
|
Processing Configurations |
Edge Delta agents dynamically self-tune to adapt to changing workload demands introduced by new processing steps
|
Adding new processing rules requires manual resource tuning or scaling to maintain performance
|
Built-In Data Relevance Awareness |
Intelligent log optimization; low-value logs are dropped at the source, high-volume data is converted to metrics
|
No built-in data relevance awareness
|
Edge Delta is built to handle large-scale and dynamic workloads, without requiring high CPU, memory, or bandwidth allocation. By distributing data processing out to the agent level, Edge Delta offers efficient pre-ingestion filtering, enrichment, masking, and optimization. Users receive out-of-the-box intelligence applied to their telemetry data, and can optimize data flows based on data volume and importance.
Cribl worker nodes are capped at 200GB per day total throughput per vCPU allocated, and are leveraged primarily for stream-based, post-ingestion processing. Cribl Stream and Edge do not provide built-in data relevance awareness capabilities.
Cribl worker nodes are capped at 200GB per day total throughput per vCPU allocated, and are leveraged primarily for stream-based, post-ingestion processing. Cribl Stream and Edge do not provide built-in data relevance awareness capabilities.
Pricing
Edge Delta vs Cribl — Pricing
|
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Pipeline Costs |
Start at $0.10 per GB ingested
|
Start at $0.21 per GB ingested
|
Edge Delta costs start at 10 cents per GB, with additional streaming options.
Cribl Edge costs start at 21 cents per GB, with additional streaming options.
Cribl Edge costs start at 21 cents per GB, with additional streaming options.
Pipeline Intelligence
Edge Delta vs Cribl — Pipeline Intelligence
|
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Pipeline Intelligence |
ML-powered log pattern detection
|
No pipeline-level intelligence
|
End-to-End Intelligence |
Data value analysis provides real-time, intelligent pipeline recommendations to reduce downstream costs and noise
|
No built-in intelligence, requires external tooling
|
Edge Delta integrates intelligence directly into its pipelines, identifying what data is useful, what can be optimized, and what must be dropped or metricized — eliminating noise before it reaches backend destinations.
Cribl solutions focus primarily on standard data processing and routing, and have no built-in pipeline intelligence.
Cribl solutions focus primarily on standard data processing and routing, and have no built-in pipeline intelligence.
Scalability
Edge Delta vs Cribl — Scalability
|
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Technology |
Built on Go — modern, highly performant, lightweight
|
Built on Javascript — inefficient for CPU-intensive workloads
|
Robust Horizontal Scaling |
Agents automatically scale as new infrastructure is created, and provide Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) support for Kubernetes deployments
|
Moderate scalability, requires hands-on infrastructure sizing
|
Robust Vertical Scaling |
Agent CPU and memory utilization is highly efficient, and limits can easily be adjusted
|
Moderate scalability, requires hands-on infrastructure sizing
|
Edge Delta agents run entirely on Go for optimal performance and efficiency. They’re built to integrate seamlessly with dynamic and ephemeral environments, scaling both horizontally and vertically to adapt to workflow demands.
Cribl pipeline solutions (Cribl Stream and Cribl Edge) are written entirely in JavaScript, a less efficient language that requires more CPU overhead for execution and garbage collection. They’re built for traditional, VM-based environments, lacking true cloud elasticity. As a result, Cribl pipelines struggle with dynamic scaling and require more time, money, and compute for infrastructure management.
Cribl pipeline solutions (Cribl Stream and Cribl Edge) are written entirely in JavaScript, a less efficient language that requires more CPU overhead for execution and garbage collection. They’re built for traditional, VM-based environments, lacking true cloud elasticity. As a result, Cribl pipelines struggle with dynamic scaling and require more time, money, and compute for infrastructure management.
Ecosystem and Integrations
Edge Delta vs Cribl — Ecosystem and Integrations
|
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Alignment with Open Source Standards |
Provides native, in-pipeline support for OpenTelemetry and OTTL, as well as wide support for open source standards across sources and destinations
|
Provides in-pipeline support for OpenTelemetry
|
Integration Support |
60+ integrations
|
80+ integrations
|
Edge Delta offers a wide range of integrations and in-pipeline support for OpenTelemetry and OpenTelemetry Transformation Language (OTTL) processing, providing users with a vendor-agnostic solution that supports any source and any destination.
Cribl offers a wide range of integrations, but provides limited open source support and has a heavy dependence on Splunk-based and other proprietary formats.
Cribl offers a wide range of integrations, but provides limited open source support and has a heavy dependence on Splunk-based and other proprietary formats.
Visibility and Control
Edge Delta vs Cribl — Visibility and Control
|
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Pipeline GUI |
Simple, point-and-click interface for adding new sources, processors, destinations, and routes
|
Script-based configuration; UI becomes harder to use as pipelines grow in complexity
|
Pipeline Visibility |
Cohesive view into pipelines and data flowing through them in real time
|
Fragmented view into pipelines, low visibility into data in-flight
|
RBAC |
Provides role-based access control
|
Provides role-based access control
|
Edge Delta provides users with comprehensive pipeline control and visibility through a telemetry control plane, which includes in-depth dashboards, pipeline health information, and an intuitive point-and-click pipeline configuration interface. Through Live Capture, Edge Delta users can visualize their data as it flows through each processing step within their pipeline.
Cribl provides relatively low visibility into users’ pipelines — particularly as pipeline complexity grows — and provides limited insights into data as it’s flowing through pipelines.
Cribl provides relatively low visibility into users’ pipelines — particularly as pipeline complexity grows — and provides limited insights into data as it’s flowing through pipelines.
Automation
Edge Delta vs Cribl — Automation
|
![]() |
|
---|---|---|
Pipeline Configuration |
Automated; manual advanced configurations when required
|
Manual
|
Out-of-the-Box Packs |
Offers pre-built pipeline packs for processing a wide variety of data formats
|
Offers pre-built pipeline packs for processing a wide variety of data formats
|
Edge Delta heavily automates pipeline configurations, and offers intelligent recommendations to tune configurations to optimize data flows based on volume and importance.
Cribl pipelines require manual configurations and continual tuning to ensure optimal performance.
Cribl pipelines require manual configurations and continual tuning to ensure optimal performance.
Ready to see Edge Delta in action?
Contact our team of technical experts to learn more.
